Remove Article Remove FDA Remove Informed Consent Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Part 3: An Update on the Federal and State E-Roe-sion or P-Roe-tection of Abortion Rights

Healthcare Law Blog

8] The court in Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, et al. The now-active provisions include a prohibition on abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy (with limited exceptions), 72-hour informed consent requirements, pre-abortion gestational age verification, and reporting requirements for abortions after 12 weeks. [21]

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – January

SQA

Of interest is a reference to the FDA’s draft document “Computer Software Assurance for Production and Quality System Software,” which was recently published on 13 September 2022. The application/notification must be submitted via the EUDAMED database (Article 69 IVDR).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2022 – Spring

SQA

The Points is an upgraded version of Practice for Cosmetics Production Licensing , implemented in 2016, with more stringent inspection requirements. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – Regulations and Guidances. Additional details for each annex are provided within the content section of the document.

FDA 75
article thumbnail

Suing the Certifiers – A Dangerous Undertaking

Drug & Device Law

Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. For qualified IMGs, it issues a certification, which IMGs can then use to apply to residency and other graduate medical education programs and to apply for state medical licenses. 23 in its current form.

Doctors 52
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

2023) (First Amendment bars state-law misrepresentation claims over “truth” of published scientific article) ( here ); National Association of Wheat Growers v. Instead, Zofran turned mainly on animal studies – three Japanese studies that were not “newly acquired information” that could avoid preemption. 4th 315 (6th Cir. Bonta , 85 F.4th

FDA 105