The Health Law Firm
MARCH 19, 2021
Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law On October 28, 2020, a Florida appeals court tossed out a medical malpractice suit accusing a University of Miami doctor of providing negligent treatment at a public teaching hospital. By George F. Indest III, J.D., Background of the Suit.
The Health Law Firm
AUGUST 7, 2018
Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law On July 30, 2018, an Arizona jury awarded a record $8 million to a physician who claimed that a medical malpractice suit wrongfully alleged that he intentionally caused a patient’s death. Cogan filed suit on behalf of a client in Arizona state court in 2013 accusing Dr.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Hall Render
JULY 22, 2022
State settles University of Iowa medical malpractice lawsuit for $7.5 New York confirms 1st national polio case since 2013. Hackers hit health companies, insurers with increasing regularity. Iowa governor signs legislation requiring more ASC transparency. Troubled Iowa nursing home closing. Iowa physicians sell $16.4M NORTH CAROLINA.
Drug & Device Law
MAY 25, 2023
There was an insufficient time to discuss the Torts: Medical Malpractice draft. 2013); (2) Massachusetts, despite its highest court retaining present injury to “address any concerns over false claims,” Donovan v. Actions Taken Membership voted to approve §§48D-48F (Sepulcher) of the draft. Footnote and lengthy list of names omitted).
Drug & Device Law
APRIL 10, 2023
Right now, the schedule for the meeting has debate on the “Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Medical Malpractice & Miscellaneous Provisions” – which includes the medical monitoring proposal – set for Monday, May 22 at 10:30 a.m. New Hampshire : Brown v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. , 3d , 2023 WL 2577257, at *2-3 (N.H.
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 13, 2023
2013) (citation and quotation marks omitted). “We. “The [procedural] regime contemplates that trial judges will perform a gatekeeping function, determining whether the. . . methodology underlying proffered expert testimony is scientifically valid and whether that. methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue.” Harris v.
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 6, 2022
They’re experienced at what they do and aren’t intimidated by plaintiffs’ counsel and their threats of malpractice claims if they don’t testify the way plaintiffs want them to. 2013 WL 4516160, at *3 (N.M. procedure that existed at the time of [plaintiff’s] injury”; malpractice was “intervening cause”) (applying Kansas law); Eck v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content