Remove 2012 Remove FDA Remove Fraud Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Suing the Certifiers – A Dangerous Undertaking

Drug & Device Law

For qualified IMGs, it issues a certification, which IMGs can then use to apply to residency and other graduate medical education programs and to apply for state medical licenses. The unfortunate truth is that ECFMG was also a victim of this fake doctor’s fraud. 2012 WL 3265002, at *5 (N.D. Such power rests solely with the FDA.”

Doctors 52
article thumbnail

TwIqbal And Punitive Damages

Drug & Device Law

Here, Plaintiffs fail to supply factual support showing Defendant acted with “oppression, fraud, or malice,” relying instead upon conclusory allegations. These allegations lack any contention or inference that [defendant] withheld or misrepresented information to the FDA. . ., at *8 (agreeing with Bouncing Angels, Inc. 2, 2020). “In

Fraud 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Comment K, Presumptions, and Medical Device Design Defects Under Texas Law

Drug & Device Law

2012 WL 956192, at *5 (S.D. March 19, 2012); Holland v. Texas, unlike most states, enforces a strong statutory presumption that prescription medical product warnings complying with FDA requirements imposed by “pre-market approval or licensing of the product” are adequate as a matter of law. 2012) (applying Texas law).

FDA 59
article thumbnail

A Texas Mess

Drug & Device Law

2012), we hailed it as the best decision of 2012. That Complaint alleges various antivax conspiracy theories concerning COVID-19 vaccines, the FDA, emergency use authorizations, and the media that have circulated since these vaccines first became available. The FDA, however, did not and does not share that belief.