article thumbnail

Anti-Abortion Advocacy Groups’ Challenge to FDA-Approved Abortion Pill May Have Far-Reaching Consequences

Health Law Advisor

Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to withdraw approval of Mifepristone, an FDA-approved drug used to end pregnancies in the first trimester. [1] The lawsuit has sparked concern by both industry and the FDA. Twenty years later, Congress codified the pathway in the FDA Safety and Innovation Act (“FDASIA”) [4].

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Losing Control of Controlled Substances? The Case of Telehealth Prescriptions 

Bill of Health

As the COVID-19 pandemic and its concomitant social-distancing efforts rendered many, if not most, health visits inaccessible, telehealth platforms and companies swiftly stepped in to allow for virtual patient-doctor consultations. One such platform is Cerebral Inc. ,

COVID-19 176
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

News from the Consumer Technology Association and Withings Further Demonstrates Private Sector’s Role in the Pandemic and Public Health

Health Populi

Since launching in 2008, Withings has developed a portfolio of well-designed, consumer-facing digital health tools such as weight scales, blood pressure monitors, and digital thermometers.

article thumbnail

ALERT! Your COVID-19 policies and procedures need a BOOSTER!

Health Law RX

The EEOC notes that employers will meet the “business necessity” standard when such testing is consistent with current guidance from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and/or state/local public health authorities. GINA Implications of COVID-19 Tests.

article thumbnail

CPAP MDL Overinflates Plaintiffs’ Claims

Drug & Device Law

Taking the good doctor first, In re Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level Pap, & Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation , 2023 WL 7019667 (Sp. CPAP II shrugs off plaintiffs’ repeated allegations that defendants “failed to apprise the FDA” of this or that, with the excuse that plaintiffs don’t really “rely” on them. Sinclair v.

Fraud 52
article thumbnail

Something To Keep an Eye on

Drug & Device Law

11, 2022), granted a Rule 702 motion excluding plaintiff’s purported FDA expert Peggy Pence, who “began working as an expert witness for plaintiffs in product liability cases in 2008” and “approximately 100% of her work was as a plaintiff’s expert in product liability litigation.” Coloplast Corp. 2022 WL 425206 (N.D.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Guest Post – Second Circuit Rejects Manufacturer’s Plan to Share Cost of Expensive Drug with Medicare Part D Beneficiaries

Drug & Device Law

The drug at issue was an FDA-recognized breakthrough drug that treats a relatively rare, but invariably fatal, condition – transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (“ATTR-CM”). 3 (2008), the court explained that “the word ‘includes,’ when used in a statute, ‘is usually a term of enlargement, and not of limitation.’” Pfizer, Inc. ,