Remove category medical-device
article thumbnail

Unpacking Averages: How Accurate Do Class II Medical Devices Need to Be to Obtain 510(k) Clearance?

Health Law Advisor

It’s common for a client to show up at my door and explain that they have performance data on a medical device they have been testing, and for the client to ask me if the performance they found is adequate to obtain FDA clearance through the 510(k) process. I often respond, very helpfully, “it depends.” Eyes wide open.

FDA 111
article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2022 – September/October

SQA

ANVISA’s Questions & Answers (Q&A) on Medical Cannabis for Clinical Investigations, 14 September 2022. Brazil’s ANVISA Announces Major Medical Device Registration Updates, 16 September 2022. ANVISA announced major updates to its Resolution of the Collegiate Board of Directors (RDC) 185/2001. CMDE Announcement No.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Who Needs a Lawyer in the Eleventh Circuit?

Drug & Device Law

The plaintiff in Jacob sued the manufacturer of a Class III, FDA premarket-approved medical device. First, the plaintiff’s non-parallel claims were “preempted to the extent” that they would have imposed “alleged labeling or manufacturing requirements that are different from, or in addition to, those imposed by the FDA.”

article thumbnail

Logical Contradiction Doctrine:  Buckman for Textualists

Drug & Device Law

The availability of this type of cutting-edge presentations is yet another reason why drug and medical device manufactures would be well served by joining PLAC. For those of you accessing the Blog on mobile devices, this post may be hard to read. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S.

FDA 72
article thumbnail

Thinking About the FDA’s Alternative Summary Reporting Program

Drug & Device Law

Bexis has been updating the preemption chapter of his treatise on drug/device product liability litigation. He came across several preemption decisions involving defendants who employed the FDA’s “alternative summary reporting” (“ASR”) system that the agency operated for about 20 years, “from 1997 through June 2019.” McLaughlin v.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

FDA and Off-Label Communication – Getting Closer to Truth

Drug & Device Law

In addition to its recent revamp of its “§510(k)” substantial equivalence clearance process for medical devices, (see our post here ), the FDA has also been active with respect to off-label communications – another regulatory area of continuing interest to this Blog. Western States Medical Center , 535 U.S. FDA , 119 F.

FDA 64