Remove COVID-19 Remove Informed Consent Remove Licensing Remove Public Health
article thumbnail

Introduction to Telebehavioral Health

AIHC

Compliance Considerations for Best Outcomes Written in collaboration with the AIHC Volunteer Education Committee Delivering mental health services via telehealth has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral telehealth may also be referred to as telebehavioral health, telemental health, telepsychiatry, or telepsychology.

article thumbnail

Telehealth for Behavioral Healthcare

Verisys

COVID has impacted every aspect of daily life, and these changes have affected people’s mental health, making telehealth services for behavioral health more important than ever. These license verification requirements have continued to change, so keeping up with regulations in telehealth is vital to compliance.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Health Provider News – February 10, 2023

Hall Render

over Claims Practices Where things stand in Central California 1 month after a community hospital’s closure California hospital names Kelly Linden CEO Upcoming California health bills to watch, including a conversation with Rep. billion since pandemic U.S. billion since pandemic U.S.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – January

SQA

Until EUDAMED is brought fully online, a series of performance study application/notification documents have been created to support performance study procedures with respect to the IVDR (see MDCG 2022-19). A concerted and collaborative effort is essential to address this threat to global health, economies, and security effectively.

article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

Plaintiff knew about it, too, since he signed an informed consent document mentioning it. Equally bad, Hrymoc effectively read a New Jersey statute, §2A:58C-5(c), which precludes punitive damages where a “device” was “licensed” by the FDA, out of existence. The device labeling specifically mentioned it. The plaintiff in M.T.

FDA 105
article thumbnail

PREP Act Immunity: Baghikian v. Providence Health & Servs.

Drug & Device Law

6, 2024), the Central District of California looked at the PREP Act in the usual context in which we deal with preemption: A tort lawsuit (involving product liability and related state law tort claims) against a medical product manufacturer (here, the manufacturers of the COVID 19 antiviral medications remdesivir and tocilizumab).