Compliance Doctors Informed Consent Malpractice 
Drug & Device Law
AUGUST 8, 2022
Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. has no power to enforce compliance”), aff’d , 405 F.
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 7, 2022
The last provision cited by plaintiff’s side was one that allows the fact finder to consider evidence of compliance with regulations. The court rejected plaintiff’s argument that changes in the doctor/patient relationship and increased DTC advertising have eroded the policy justification for the learned intermediary rule.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content