Remove 2014 Remove FDA Remove Governance Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary 4 | Monthly Update 2021

SQA

Commission in March 2015 after the publication, in December 2014, of the Q3D Guideline on Elemental Impurities (EI) by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH). Backgrounder – Government of Canada Investments in Biomanufacturing, Development of COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics, and Research, 18 May 2021.

FDA 52
article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – March And April

SQA

The company did not have a written procedure in place for the provision of information related to serious risk of injury to health, contrary to what was committed to on it establishment license application. The name and address of manufacturers provided by the company on its establishment license application were not accurate.

FDA 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

FDA Oversight of AI Software Developed by Health Care Providers

Health Law Advisor

But the question is, to what extent do health care providers need to worry about FDA requirements as they use AI? FDA has been regulating machine learning algorithms used in a clinical context for decades. It’s important to understand that FDA regulation isn’t punitive in the sense that it’s only intended to apply to bad people.

FDA 98
article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2024

SQA

The glossary was originally published in 2014 and has been used to define excipient terms and acronyms commonly found in IPEC guides. This standard is a globally recognized standard that provides guidelines for the governance and management of AI technologies.

FDA 52
article thumbnail

PREP Act Immunity: Baghikian v. Providence Health & Servs.

Drug & Device Law

Not to mention, it is a powerful defense for our clients in product liability matters because it can foreclose liability and plaintiffs’ use of tort lawsuits (invariably creatures of state law origin) to impose requirements on medical devices or pharmaceuticals that the federal FDA did not. What could be better than preemption? United Bhd.

article thumbnail

NPP, DCC, And FDA-Regulated Medical Products

Drug & Device Law

We are not looking do either of those, but we will weigh in on what NPP means for non-product liability cases involving FDA-regulated medical products. Both talk a fair amount about “commerce” and the respective roles of the states and federal government. Are we down to talk about NPP and its impact on reproductive rights litigation?

FDA 59
article thumbnail

The FDA and Feasible Alternative Designs

Drug & Device Law

But in prescription medical product liability litigation, products must receive FDA approval, clearance or other authorization (hereafter, collectively referred to as “approval” for short) before they can be marketed. Are manufacturers liable only for failing to employ an alternative design that the FDA has approved for distribution. . .

FDA 59