2012 Doctors FDA Malpractice 
Drug & Device Law
AUGUST 8, 2022
Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. 2012 WL 3265002, at *5 (N.D. 23 in its current form.
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 6, 2022
They’re experienced at what they do and aren’t intimidated by plaintiffs’ counsel and their threats of malpractice claims if they don’t testify the way plaintiffs want them to. 2012), it had to apply the rule. Confident prescribing physicians and implanting surgeons are the best “learned” intermediaries. Hamilton , 372 S.W.3d
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content