Remove category agency-information
article thumbnail

HHS Issues Proposed Rule to Provide Clarity on Rights of Conscience in Healthcare

Healthcare Law Blog

251 (1997), included conscience provisions for Medicaid and Medicare programs, prohibiting Medicaid managed care-managed organizations and Medicare Advantage plans from prohibiting or restricting a physician from informing a patient about their health and full range of treatment options.

ACA 105
article thumbnail

Medicare Advantage RADV Audit Final Rule Challenged in Court

Healthcare Law Blog

Refresher on the RADV Final Rule The Final Rule will implement the following changes: CMS will extrapolate RADV audit findings beginning with payment year (“PY”) 2018, and will not extrapolate RADV audit findings for PYs 2011 through 2017, though it will continue to collect the non-extrapolated overpayments that are identified.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – January

SQA

Eudralex, Volume 4: GMP Guidelines and Annexes Revision of the EU GMP Guide Annex 11 “Computerized Systems” – Presentation of Concept Paper, 18 November 2022 On 16 November 2022, the European Medicines Agency EMA published a concept paper on the planned revision of Annex 11 “Computerized Systems.”

article thumbnail

FDA Oversight of AI Software Developed by Health Care Providers

Health Law Advisor

In the last couple of years, each Fall, FDA has been updating a list of machine learning applications in health care that the agency has cleared or otherwise approved. [1] Although that regulation was published in 2011, FDA still uses it as the foundation for determining whether an organization qualifies as an MDDS manufacturer.

FDA 98
article thumbnail

How the Fifty States View Electronic Data as a “Product”

Drug & Device Law

We have blogged several times about the somewhat esoteric issue of whether intangible items – chiefly computer software, website algorithms, and other electronic information – is treated as a “product” for purposes of imposing strict liability on their creators. 19, comment d. 19, comment f. See UCC §§2-103(1)(m), 2-105(1). 673, 676 (Cal.

article thumbnail

FDA and Off-Label Communication – Getting Closer to Truth

Drug & Device Law

552 (2011); Thompson v. However, the FDA’s new Draft Guidance introduces another phrase, “scientific information on unapproved use(s)” (“SIUU”), that at least has a decent acronym, so we will use that. E.g. , Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. , Western States Medical Center , 535 U.S. 357 (2002); United States v. Caronia , 703 F.3d

FDA 64
article thumbnail

Logical Contradiction Doctrine:  Buckman for Textualists

Drug & Device Law

280 (1995), decision that he joined in 1995 He joined a decision that found no preemption by virtue of a governmental decision not to regulate in Myrick and did not object to boilerplate description of obstacle preemption as an accepted preemption category Then in the 5-4 Geier v. Bartlett , 570 U.S. Levine , 555 U.S. citation in PLIVA, Inc.

FDA 72