article thumbnail

Introductory Editorial — Critical Psychedelic Studies: Correcting the Hype

Bill of Health

Although I have been advocating for a critical psychedelic humanities since 2010 , I was one of the only humanists at early psychedelic conferences. As each contribution emphasizes, these oversights have ethical implications for research design, informed consent processes, and public communication.

article thumbnail

Intersectionality, Indigeneity, and Disability Climate Justice in Nepal

Bill of Health

Strikingly, the glacier area in Nepal decreased 24% from 1980-2010, and glacial retreat has decreased mountain slope stability. Temperature rise is causing acute climate hazards such as landslides, avalanches, floods, heatwaves, and forest fires, as well as chronic hazards including droughts, glacial retreat, and glacial outburst floods.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Malarkey ? The Ten Worst Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

23, 2010) ( here ), can supersede our list, so far they’ve been thankfully uncommon. Allegedly, consumers deprived of efficacy (not risk) information had their informed consent rights infringed, which in the case of persons without the genetic difference, meant that they were spared the expense of undergoing negative genetic testing.

FDA 52
article thumbnail

Confident Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

2010) (no causation because “[t]he doctor provided explicit, uncontroverted testimony that, even when provided with the most current research and FDA mandated warnings, he still would have prescribed” the drug to the decedent) (applying Georgia law). at 1233 (citation omitted). Accord Dietz v. Smithkline Beecham Corp. , 3d 812, 816 (11th Cir.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Unimpressed Learned Intermediaries Defeat Warning Causation

Drug & Device Law

2010), vacated on other grounds , 88 A.3d 2010) (no “evidence that [plaintiff’s prescribers] would have altered their decision”). 2010) (applying Arizona law); In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation , 2009 WL 2487305, at *14 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) (applying Pennsylvania law). 3d 572 (Pa. 3d 954 (Pa. Wyeth, Inc. 817 (2d Cir.

Doctors 59
article thumbnail

Suing the Certifiers – A Dangerous Undertaking

Drug & Device Law

Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. Smith, LLC , 2010 WL 11566367, at *7 (N.D. May 14, 2010) (“Defendant [standards institute’s] standards are voluntary, consensus standards, and Defendant. . . 23 in its current form. 471 (11th Cir.

Doctors 52
article thumbnail

Stupid Expert Tricks Redux

Drug & Device Law

2010) (Matsen); Nelson v. Moline obtained from her employer’s institutional review board to conduct the article was structured to “reference[] federal regulations governing human subject research,” while simultaneously “waiv[ing] the requirement that Dr. Moline obtain informed consent from the individuals whose cases she planned to study.”