2009 Doctors FDA Informed Consent 
Drug & Device Law
JUNE 6, 2022
Further, “both doctors testified that they still prescribe [the drug] for patients with conditions similar to plaintiff’s condition.” 2009), reversed a plaintiff’s verdict for entry of judgment n.o.v. Schering Corp. , 2d 1140, 1148 (N.J. 1993) (dissenting opinion). at 1150 (citations omitted). Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. Mason , 27 So.3d
Drug & Device Law
AUGUST 22, 2022
The plaintiff in Jacob sued the manufacturer of a Class III, FDA premarket-approved medical device. First, the plaintiff’s non-parallel claims were “preempted to the extent” that they would have imposed “alleged labeling or manufacturing requirements that are different from, or in addition to, those imposed by the FDA.” 341 (2001).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content