Drug & Device Law

MAY 30, 2022

The law presumes that licensed doctors know what they are doing. 1978), where a hypertensive patient was injured after being injected with the defendant’s drug – despite warnings that “expressly directed the doctor administering the drug to refrain from giving it to a patient with hypertension.” Best Pharmacal , 577 P.2d Robins Co. ,

Doctors 59

Doctors Licensing Informed Consent Hospitals 59

Drug & Device Law

AUGUST 8, 2022

Apparently, a fraudulent foreign-trained “doctor” treated the plaintiffs, none of whom claimed malpractice or any physical injury whatsoever. Anyway, this fraudulent “doctor” allegedly “touched them without informed consent” and caused them “emotional distress. 23 in its current form. 471 (11th Cir. 2d 775, 799 & n.114

Doctors 52

Doctors Fraud Licensing Compliance 52

Drug & Device Law

JUNE 6, 2022

Further, “both doctors testified that they still prescribe [the drug] for patients with conditions similar to plaintiff’s condition.” 2007 WL 2526402, at *3 (D. 2007 WL 5861354, at *4 (C.D. 2007 WL 5861354, at *4 (C.D. 8, 2019) (no causation where prescriber “testified that none of the additional risk information. . .

FDA 59

FDA Doctors Malpractice Medical Personnel 59