article thumbnail

Importance of Regulatory Compliance in Healthcare

Compliancy Group

It also reduces waste, fraud, and abuse that threaten the efficiency of healthcare delivery and services. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA) The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA) of 2005 spurred the development of a system to encourage healthcare staff to report medical errors voluntarily.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court Clarifies the Government’s FCA Dismissal Power and Invites Constitutional Challenge to the FCA’s Qui Tam Provision

Health Law RX

The First Circuit placed an onus on the relator to avoid dismissal by showing that the Government’s motion was “transgress[ing] constitutional limitations” or “perpetrating a fraud on the court” ( Borzilleri v. 2005) (adopting Sequoia Orange standard)). Bayer Healthcare Pharms., 4th 32, 42 (1st Cir. Sequoia Orange Co. Kaiser-Hill Co.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

HIPAA Compliance Guide: All Your Questions Answered

Total HIPAA

The Security Rule (2005). The type of offense usually describes individuals committing healthcare fraud by posing as another person. The Security Rule regulates cybersecurity and establishes guidelines for protecting electronic PHI (ePHI). Level Two: Offenses Committed Under False Pretenses.

HIPAA 52
article thumbnail

CPAP MDL Overinflates Plaintiffs’ Claims

Drug & Device Law

Basically, CPAP II purported to do precisely what Buckman itself prohibited: using express preemption to limit the “ordinary working” of implied preemption of fraud on the FDA claims. We saw more of the same with the discussion of consumer fraud claims in CPAP II. American Home Products , 2005 WL 2277518, at *11 (S.D.

Fraud 52
article thumbnail

Twombly and Iqbal Taken Seriously: Express-Preemption Dismissal

Drug & Device Law

The plaintiff asserted all the usual claims and then one: manufacturing defect; failure to warn; breach of warranty; and fraud. Poozhikala involves a purportedly defective implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) whose battery was alleged to have suffered rapid battery depletion. McMullen v. Medtronic, Inc. , 3d 482, 489 (7th Cir.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

A Texas Mess

Drug & Device Law

The relevant legislative history demonstrates that Congress enacted the PREP Act in 2005: To encourage the expeditious development and deployment of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency. . . [by] Alabama State Board of Pharmacy , 61 F.4th 4th 902, 905 (11th Cir. 247d-6d(c)(1)(A)(i)). Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S.

article thumbnail

Comment K, Presumptions, and Medical Device Design Defects Under Texas Law

Drug & Device Law

Wyeth , 2005 WL 544222, at *6 (N.D. March 4, 2005), rev’d on other grounds , 462 F.3d Atkinson pointed out that the main exception – fraud on the FDA − to this otherwise not easily rebutted presumption of warning adequacy is preempted. Genentech Inc. 2012 WL 956192, at *5 (S.D. March 19, 2012); Holland v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

FDA 59