article thumbnail

FDA Finalizes Its Informed Consent Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators and Sponsors

Hall Render

Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) finalized “ Informed Consent: Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors ” (“Final Guidance”), following the FDA’s earlier issuance of draft guidance on the subject in July 2014. On August 15, 2023, the U.S. study sponsor, regulatory agencies, etc.)

article thumbnail

How the Medical Industry Can Help Combat the Current Coronavirus Crisis

Exeed Regulatory Compliance

It rapidly caused a widespread epidemic in China and has spread to over 50 countries outside of China with more than 90,000 confirmed cases and 3000 deaths at the time of this blog article. This is where FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) comes into play and offers an opportunity for the medical industry to rally and help.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – May And June

SQA

The rules of RDC 786/2023 correspond to a normative update, which replaces RDC 302/2005. Although this Toolkit provides PCPC’s current thinking on MoCRA, companies should be mindful that MoCRA represents meaningful new authorities that FDA has yet to interpret and apply. cosmetic regulatory framework.

FDA 40
article thumbnail

CPAP MDL Overinflates Plaintiffs’ Claims

Drug & Device Law

CPAP II shrugs off plaintiffs’ repeated allegations that defendants “failed to apprise the FDA” of this or that, with the excuse that plaintiffs don’t really “rely” on them. American Home Products , 2005 WL 2277518, at *11 (S.D. 16, 2005); Huntman v. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S. 341 (2001). 2023 WL 7019287, at *7.

Fraud 52
article thumbnail

Twombly and Iqbal Taken Seriously: Express-Preemption Dismissal

Drug & Device Law

As readers of this blog are aware, case law is divided over whether alleged CGMP violations can ever support a non-preempted claim (with the more persuasive cases holding that they cannot). Plaintiffs alleged that manufactured had failed to investigate and report the event to the FDA as purportedly required. 2022 WL 1076173, at *5.

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Logical Contradiction Doctrine:  Buckman for Textualists

Drug & Device Law

For those of you accessing the Blog on mobile devices, this post may be hard to read. 470 (1996), was decided – removing express preemption as a defense for manufacturers of §510(k) products So defendants moved on fraud on the FDA under an implied preemption theory and won. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S. Mensing , 564 U.S.

FDA 72
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Eliminates Appellate Procedure Trap for the Unwary

Drug & Device Law

3d 411, 422-23 (2005). So, why does the Drug and Device Law Blog care? We’ve often said that we like preemption being a question of law because, on the whole, we expect that our FDA-related facts will more persuasive than the other side’s, so we want courts to decide these issues as soon as possible. Varghese v. Not anymore.

FDA 59