Lovely Warnings Causation (and More) Mesh Decision from the Central District of California
Drug & Device Law
DECEMBER 9, 2022
And the court agreed, finding that “the undisputed facts reflected that [the doctor] testified she read the IFU, relied on the warnings provided by [the defendant], believed she had a comprehensive informed consent process, and would have passed on a warning about the risk of severe and chronic pain to patients. Pfizer, Inc ,196 F.
64 
Let's personalize your content