Remove 2011 Remove Compliance Remove FDA Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

Understanding the 2025 Medicare Part D Re-design: What You Need to Know

Innovaare Compliance

6] A compound drug not approved by the FDA under a New Drug Application or Biological License Application does not meet the definition of an applicable drug and will not be eligible for Part D. 3] Over several years, the “donut hole” or coverage gap for Part D has been closing since 2011. [4] Non-applicable drugs (i.e.,

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary | Monthly Update 2023 – January

SQA

” The reason: The existing document of the EU GMP Guideline dates back to 2011 and no longer corresponds to the state of the art in various areas or does not consider increasingly important new technologies for the GMP field, according to the EMA. ” The requirements for providers (e.g.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SQA Regulatory Surveillance Summary 6 | Monthly Update 2021

SQA

Brazil’s New UDI Requirements for Medical Devices: Compliance Implications for Manufacturers, 02 August 2021. UDI compliance lead times for manufacturers will depend on the risk classification of their devices: Two years for Class IV (highest risk) devices. By Laurel Hacche & Debra Cortner SQA Associates. European Commission (EC).

FDA 52
article thumbnail

FDA Oversight of AI Software Developed by Health Care Providers

Health Law Advisor

But the question is, to what extent do health care providers need to worry about FDA requirements as they use AI? FDA has been regulating machine learning algorithms used in a clinical context for decades. It’s important to understand that FDA regulation isn’t punitive in the sense that it’s only intended to apply to bad people.

FDA 98
article thumbnail

The BFDs – The Ten Best Prescription Drug/Medical Device Decisions of 2023

Drug & Device Law

Since the FDA requires pre-approval of any warnings about off-label uses, preemption at some point should have been pre-ordained under the Mensing ( 2011+1 ) independence principle, but off-label use did not really figure in Zofran ’s analysis. The FDA’s five reviews of teratogenic risk all came to the same conclusion.

FDA 105
article thumbnail

Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Based on Implied Preemption

Drug & Device Law

640.65, an FDA biologics regulation that requires entities that collect blood via a particular method to establish “donor identification system[s]” that “positively identifies each donor and relates such donor directly to his blood and its components as well as to his accumulated records and laboratory data.”. g)(1) and 640.65(b)(3)

FDA 59