Remove 2008 Remove FDA Remove Fraud Remove Governance
article thumbnail

States and Feds Signal Big Changes to Telehealth Prescribing

Health Law Advisor

1] Originally enacted in 2010, the Online Prescribing Act has allowed health care providers to register with the State to prescribe and dispense certain FDA-approved drugs via online pharmacies and utilization of telehealth visits. Utah Code § 58-83-306. Once signed into law, the effect of H.B. 152 , amending Utah Code § 26-60-103.

article thumbnail

The Wait is Over. Or Is It? DEA’s Proposed Rules Around Telemedicine Prescribing: Initial Impressions and Key Takeaways

Health Law Advisor

Background on the Ryan Haight Act The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 (the “Ryan Haight Act”) made certain amendments to the CSA which established controls on the remote prescribing of controlled substances. 18 U.S.C. § Are the proposed record-keeping obligations reasonable and/or sufficient? 1301.28.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post – Second Circuit Rejects Manufacturer’s Plan to Share Cost of Expensive Drug with Medicare Part D Beneficiaries

Drug & Device Law

The drug at issue was an FDA-recognized breakthrough drug that treats a relatively rare, but invariably fatal, condition – transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (“ATTR-CM”). 3 (2008), the court explained that “the word ‘includes,’ when used in a statute, ‘is usually a term of enlargement, and not of limitation.’” Pfizer, Inc. ,

article thumbnail

Thinking About the FDA’s Alternative Summary Reporting Program

Drug & Device Law

He came across several preemption decisions involving defendants who employed the FDA’s “alternative summary reporting” (“ASR”) system that the agency operated for about 20 years, “from 1997 through June 2019.” without adversely affecting FDA’s ability to monitor and react to such events. 18, 2022) ( available here ).

FDA 59
article thumbnail

Logical Contradiction Doctrine:  Buckman for Textualists

Drug & Device Law

440 (2008) Buckman was not cited at all in the Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 470 (1996), was decided – removing express preemption as a defense for manufacturers of §510(k) products So defendants moved on fraud on the FDA under an implied preemption theory and won. Plaintiffs Legal Committee , 531 U.S. Kent , 552 U.S.

FDA 72
article thumbnail

PMA Preemption Guts Ohio Case Down to Narrow Failure to Warn Claim

Drug & Device Law

As evidenced by our PMA Preemption Score Card , on which today’s case became the 651 st entry, defendant manufacturers of FDA-approved Class III medical devices generally do pretty well with preemption motions. The device was pre-market approved by the FDA in 1996 and has been sold throughout the United States ever since. 312 (2008).

FDA 52