The HIPAA Journal is the leading provider of news, updates, and independent advice for HIPAA compliance

$30,000 Penalty for Disclosing PHI Online in Response to Negative Reviews

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has agreed to settle a HIPAA violation case with a New Jersey provider of adult and child psychiatric services for $30,000. In April 2020, OCR received a complaint alleging Manasa Health Center had impermissibly disclosed patient information online when responding to a negative online review. The complainant alleged Manasa Health Center’s responded to a patient’s review and disclosed the patient’s mental health diagnosis and treatment information.

OCR launched an investigation into the Kendall Park, NJ-based healthcare provider and discovered the protected health information of a total of four patients had been impermissibly disclosed in responses to negative Google Reviews, and notified the practice about the HIPAA Privacy Rule investigation on November 18, 2020. In addition to the impermissible disclosures of PHI, which violated 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule, the practice was determined to have failed to comply with standards, implementation specifications, or other requirements of  the HIPAA Privacy Rule and Breach Notification Rules – 45 C.F.R. § 164.530(i).

Manasa Health Center chose to settle the case with OCR with no admission of liability or wrongdoing. In addition to the financial penalty, Manasa Health Center has agreed to adopt a corrective action plan which includes the requirement to develop, maintain, and revise its written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the HIPAA Privacy Rule, provide training to all members of the workforce on those policies and procedures, issue breach notification letters to the individuals whose PHI was impermissibly disclosed online, and submit a breach report to OCR about those disclosures.

This is not the first time that OCR has imposed a financial penalty for disclosures of PHI on social media and online review platforms. In 2022, OCR agreed to a $23,000 settlement with New Vision Dental and imposed a civil monetary penalty of $50,000 on Dr. U. Phillip Igbinadolor, D.M.D. & Associates, P.A. In 2019, OCR settled an online disclosure case with Elite Dental Associates for $10,000. The HIPAA Privacy Rule does not prohibit HIPAA-regulated entities from responding to online reviews or using social media; however, protected health information must not be disclosed online without written consent from the patient. You can read more about HIPAA and social media here.

Get The FREE
HIPAA Compliance Checklist

Immediate Delivery of Checklist Link To Your Email Address

Please Enter Correct Email Address

Your Privacy Respected

HIPAA Journal Privacy Policy

“OCR continues to receive complaints about health care providers disclosing their patients’ protected health information on social media or on the internet in response to negative reviews. Simply put, this is not allowed,” said OCR Director Melanie Fontes Rainer. “The HIPAA Privacy Rule expressly protects patients from this type of activity, which is a clear violation of both patient trust and the law. OCR will investigate and take action when we learn of such impermissible disclosures, no matter how large or small the organization.”

This is the 5th OCR HIPAA enforcement action in 2023 that has been resolved with a financial penalty. So far this year, $1,661,500 has been paid by HIPAA-regulated entities to resolve violations of the HIPAA Rules.

Author: Steve Alder is the editor-in-chief of HIPAA Journal. Steve is responsible for editorial policy regarding the topics covered in The HIPAA Journal. He is a specialist on healthcare industry legal and regulatory affairs, and has 10 years of experience writing about HIPAA and other related legal topics. Steve has developed a deep understanding of regulatory issues surrounding the use of information technology in the healthcare industry and has written hundreds of articles on HIPAA-related topics. Steve shapes the editorial policy of The HIPAA Journal, ensuring its comprehensive coverage of critical topics. Steve Alder is considered an authority in the healthcare industry on HIPAA. The HIPAA Journal has evolved into the leading independent authority on HIPAA under Steve’s editorial leadership. Steve manages a team of writers and is responsible for the factual and legal accuracy of all content published on The HIPAA Journal. Steve holds a Bachelor’s of Science degree from the University of Liverpool. You can connect with Steve via LinkedIn or email via stevealder(at)hipaajournal.com

x

Is Your Organization HIPAA Compliant?

Find Out With Our Free HIPAA Compliance Checklist

Get Free Checklist